Meridian Intermediaries

Precise work for teams pursuing serious contracts.

We develop and implement evidence systems that procurement teams recognise and delivery teams can defend. Built for evaluation, due diligence, and mobilisation, our work is clear under scrutiny, consistent across submissions, and practical to maintain. We focus on structure, traceable proof, and evaluator-ready writing.

Evidence first
Claims are supported by proof, and proof is organised for fast reuse.
Submission ready
Writing is structured for evaluation: coherent, scorable, and consistent.
Delivery aligned
Commitments are checked against delivery reality before they become bid statements.

What we do

We close the gap between what you state, what you can evidence, and what you can deliver.

Send a brief →

Contract readiness

Policies, registers, statements, and an evidence framework built as a maintainable system that scales with future bids.

  • Evidence indexing and naming standards
  • Controlled drafting and version discipline
  • Reusable responses for recurring questionnaires

Bid support

Requirements mapping, response structure, and quality assurance that reads as decision-ready: coherent, complete, and defensible.

  • Requirements mapping and response planning
  • Claims tied directly to evidence
  • Final QA for clarity, consistency, and delivery risk
Operate like an internal standards function
We establish structure, confirm proof, and produce writing that holds up in evaluation and mobilisation.
How we work

What you receive

Practical outputs you can  maintain, and defend. Not just documents.

View the offer →

Evidence library

A controlled, indexed set of proof with clear owners, dates, and renewal points.

  • Evidence index and naming convention
  • Document control and version log
  • Renewal calendar and responsibilities

Compliance matrix

A requirement-by-requirement map that shows exactly how you meet each condition.

  • Requirement → response → evidence link
  • Gaps and remediation actions
  • Audit trail for evaluation questions

Submission pack

Evaluator-ready writing and QA checks that reduce ambiguity and inconsistency.

  • Structured response templates
  • Claim-to-proof checks
  • Final consistency and risk review

How it works

A simple process designed for speed, control, and defensibility.

1) Map

We review buyer requirements, scoring criteria, and delivery constraints. Then we produce a clear plan.

2) Build

We assemble proof, establish structure, and draft responses with disciplined document control.

3) Verify

We run QA gates: clarity, consistency, evidence traceability, and delivery realism.

Selected outcomes

Examples of what changes when evidence, writing, and delivery alignment are treated as one system.

Fewer clarification loops

Rebuilt claim-to-evidence traceability and removed inconsistent statements, reducing follow-up queries and last-minute rewrites.

Reusable, controlled submissions

Established an evidence index, naming standard, and response templates so repeat bids could be assembled faster with fewer errors.

If you have a deadline
Send the requirements and date. We will respond with scope, approach, and timeline.
Send requirements

The Group

Three disciplines delivered under one standard of quality.

Explore →
Meridian Compliance mark

Compliance

Documentation and evidence systems built to hold under scrutiny.

Meridian Procurement mark

Procurement

Requirements mapping, response structure, and evaluator-focused quality assurance.

Meridian Intermediation mark

Intermediation

Delivery governance and third-party alignment across partners, channels, and contract interfaces.

Next step

Share the buyer requirements and the deadline. We will respond with scope, delivery approach, and a clear timeline.

Contact →